The volatility that we’ve experienced in the global markets in recent months serves as a great reminder: although markets generally “climb a wall of worry” over the long run, they don’t do so in a straight line. While the first half of 2015 resulted in a flat S&P 500, this year’s third quarter brought the much-anticipated correction that we (and much of Wall Street) had been patiently awaiting.

But while corrections are no fun for investors, they are a normal and necessary component of the long-term market cycle. Moreover, market pullbacks give value investors like us opportunities to put our expertise to work. Our firm has been finding value in stocks such as Emerson Electric (EMR), which now trades at 12 times next year’s earnings while offering a 4.4% yield (please see our EMR analysis on Page 7). And with companies such as Procter & Gamble (PG) and Chevron (CVX) yielding 3.7% and 5.5%, respectively, good investments become even better ones in down markets. So while corrections (more…)

The month of August showed the return of volatility in the financial markets. The S&P 500 dropped 11% in the span of seven days and the VIX, widely known as “the Fear Index,” hit an intraday high of 53 – a level not seen since the financial crisis. In one day of trading, the Dow Jones Industrial Average opened down more than 1,000 points within the first hour, causing a “Flash Crash” as many ETF investors attempted to run for the exits. All of this chaos resulted in the >10% correction we had been long awaiting.

Throughout this volatile time, I received texts and calls from relatives asking if they should sell or trim their portfolios. My response often was “What? Why would you? I’m buying!” As we have mentioned in previous articles, >10% corrections are common and have occurred about every two years since 1957. Selling or trimming your portfolio during these corrections is one of the (more…)

Hardesty Capital Management spends a considerable amount of time searching the universe of publicly traded companies for undervalued stocks to purchase in our clients’ accounts. Aside from research roles, our portfolio managers are responsible for all aspects of portfolio construction and supervision, which includes the management of gains and losses that are realized in our clients’ taxable accounts. Of course, tax implications are not the paramount concern in the management of a portfolio, but trading responsibly with this in mind can make a big difference for investors come tax day in April.

Selling at a loss may seem to run counter to your investment goals, but because the IRS allows for investment losses to be used to offset capital gains, investors should look to make the best of an otherwise unprofitable investment. With that in mind, and with the end of the year quickly approaching, investors should consider selling poor performers in their taxable accounts by conducting tax loss sales. This strategy is especially good for investors in the 25-35% Federal tax brackets who must (more…)

Many financial advisors build a book of business using mutual funds for their affluent clients. Is it because funds have favorable characteristics and offer stronger investment returns? Absolutely not – mutual funds have many drawbacks!! First, they limit an advisor’s ability to customize a portfolio and manage risk effectively. Second, they add an additional layer of fees, which reduces an investor’s returns. Third, they are inefficient for investors who want to manage their tax bills. (Please see our Tax Loss Harvesting article on page 5.) Small retail investors have few options and mutual funds may make sense for them. Fortunately, our clients enjoy a customized approach to managing their money. We invest in a diversified portfolio of individual stocks and bonds to meet your goals. Please read on and you will understand why we favor our approach.

Often, advisors put clients into mutual funds because they lack robust in-house research, or it simply frees up the advisors’ time to go find new business. While funds offer investors instant diversification, it’s a one-size-fits-all approach. A fund manager’s objective may be quite different from that of the investor. For example, a manager’s compensation may be linked to outperforming a benchmark with no consideration for the level of risk taken, the amount of taxes passed on (more…)

As the third quarter wound to a close, we learned from the Bureau of Economic Analysis that gross domestic product for the second quarter was revised to 3.9% year-over-year growth from a previous estimate of 3.7%. Despite the strong economic data, the stock market posted dismal performance, with the broad Standard & Poor’s 500 index down 6.9% for the quarter. Volatility has reemerged as investors face an uncertain landscape. Although we often analyze economic data to provide insight into future stock market returns, more often is the case that the stock market provides a glimpse into the future of the economy.

The global economy is as weak as it has been since the Great Recession. A slowing of the Chinese economy is the latest cause of indigestion. It is difficult to overemphasize the importance of the second largest economy in the world. With reported annual average GDP expansion rates in excess of 7% for many years, the Chinese economy has been the global growth driver. As Chinese production has slowed, the prices of raw materials for that (more…)

Our outlook for 2015, presented in our January issue, was titled “Don’t Fight the Fed.” Low interest rates have made bonds an unattractive investment option during a period when common stocks continue to plow higher. However, with the Federal Reserve now poised to begin raising interest rates, the uncertainty regarding the timing and magnitude of rate increases has left the equity and fixed income markets skittish. The market, in anticipation of Fed action, sent stocks lower during the second quarter. By the first week of June, nearly all stock market gains for the year had been erased. The Fed’s statement following its mid-June meeting led to a market rally as commentary was more dovish than anticipated. The bond market has also moved in anticipation of higher rates. The yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury followed suit, climbing from a low of 1.86% to as high as 2.48% during the quarter.

Although the Fed is nearing an inflection point, we do not see near-term rate actions negatively impacting the economy. In the Fed we trust: we believe any rate increases will be slow and measured. (more…)

Many investors are riding high and feeling great as we continue to see gains in one of the longest bull markets since the 1940s.

As we know, the bull market will only last so long: sooner or later, we are going to see a correction. We are monitoring the market’s higher valuation very closely. No one knows when it will come or how large the dip will be, but we do know it is coming. What’s important is staying strong in your investment strategy and fighting the urge to sell.

Retail investors (those who trade their portfolios non-professionally) have performance that significantly lags the market overall. This dynamic occurs because they tend to act on emotion, selling at the bottom and missing the large early gains of a recovery. (more…)

The U.S. Shale Revolution has proved to be nothing short of remarkable. Through the use of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, also known as “fracking,” the U.S. has become one of the world’s largest oil producers with production of 9.7 million barrels per day, representing approximately 10% of global production. However, many investors believe that the recent decline in oil prices to $60 per barrel has posed a threat to many U.S. shale producers.

Although prior oil crashes have imposed drastic effects on oil producers, the dynamics of shale drilling offer a different production scenario. While production from a conventional well can produce a steady volume for several decades, production from the average shale well typically declines an estimated 60% to 70% after the first year. This drop forces companies to have more flexibility in well development in addition to well production. (more…)

As we begin the New Year, Maryland investors find themselves in a bit of a quandary: where to invest in 2014. There do not appear to be any clear options. The consensus view on Wall Street is that interest rates will move higher. If correct, that would mean their more safe investments, bonds, are headed for another difficult year. Stocks are up significantly since the financial crisis and appear fully valued. Perhaps the year will not be kind to stocks either. Cash is yielding nothing and unless the Fed has a drastic change of heart, that is not expected to change. So, what’s an investor to do in this environment?

The bond market is probably not the answer as we are most likely headed for another difficult year. The Quantitative Easing program should end in 2014 and the Fed may begin to seriously contemplate increasing the Fed Funds rate. The mere threat of tapering the QE program in 2013 caused a violent reaction as the yield on the 10-year Treasury spiked from 2% in June to 3% in September. The 10-year Treasury began 2013 yielding 1.76%. An upward bias to yields of most maturities longer than 2 years persisted throughout 2013 and many pundits suggest 2014 will likely be no different. Investors are not used to losing money in their bond investments. (more…)

Several times a month I am asked where I think the stock market will be in six months or a year. The question implies that I am some sort of stock market astrologer, and that would be very scary. I just reply “I have no idea.” In the short term, I doubt that anybody has much of an idea where the stock market will go. But over the last 75 years, the market has provided an average total return of 9.4% compounded annually, comprised of 5.4% price appreciation and 4.0% dividend yield.

But the market direction question is really trying to ask is how do you time the market: when do you sell out and when do you buy in? This strategy of market timing is fraught with risk and can be very dangerous. The timing of the market requires two critical decisions: when to get out and, more importantly, when to get back in. The second decision, when to reenter the market, is really the hard part. (more…)

For the first time in my life, I am being asked when I plan to retire. It seems like only yesterday, when as a ten or twelve year old, I would sit in church on Sunday mornings thinking I would never finish my education, let alone turn sixty-five, then considered a normal retirement age. Now I am sixty-seven and advising clients on retirement planning.

Sooner or later, almost every retired client of our firm; a young sixty something or the very old; the moderately wealthy or the very rich; the big livers or thrifty old ladies, all ask the same question: “Will I run out of money in my lifetime?” I have come to the conclusion that no matter how wealthy you are, you will know you are old when you think you might run out of money. (more…)

Not too long ago someone asked me what kind of an investor I was. I was tempted to make a joke of the question and answer simply, “A good one.” But then I thought of one of my old professors at Columbia Business School, Benjamin Graham, and I realized the depth of the question.

Graham lived from 1894 to 1976, wrote extensively, and was widely accepted as one of the most influential investment minds of all-time. He was credited with educating many investment luminaries including Warren Buffet, former Goldman Sachs partner Leon Cooperman, Mario Gabelli of the Gabelli Asset Management and, of course, me! (more…)

Over the last 30 years, there have been monumental changes to the investment advisory industry in our region. Many great, locally owned firms, like Alex Brown and Mercantile Safe Deposit & Trust, are gone. Others, such as T. Rowe Price and Legg Mason, survived and thrived. Dozens of small money management firms have been created as professionals left larger organizations over the years to start their own. As a result of these movements, the local investment advisory landscape is currently dominated by brokers, Registered Investment Advisors, and banks. RIAs seem to be growing the fastest at the moment, primarily because that business model appeals the most to both clients and practitioners.

The brokerage industry has witnessed mass defections to the RIA model as brokers have struggled with the shrinking compensation levels they have been forced to endure. Most of the compensation to brokers in the past was centered on transaction-based fees and 12b-1 fees from mutual funds. As brokerage firms reduced payouts and attempted to shift clients toward an assetbased fee, many in the industry decided to start their own practice as RIAs. Entire companies were formed to provide platforms for these disenfranchised brokers to start their businesses. (more…)

As Warren Buffet said, “Be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful.” Maryland investors do not need a “high-powered” New York investment advisory firm to follow this advice. Our Baltimore-based firm believes so strongly in these words that we’ve placed the quote at the top of the agenda for our weekly investment committee meeting. It’s so easy to get caught up in the emotional side of investing because it is our emotions about money that drive us to invest in the first place. We all love to make money and hate to lose it—greed and fear are the engines of the markets no matter where you live.

There are many reasons why truly successful investors are terrific at what they do. Foremost is their ability to take the emotion out of investing, which allows them to sell closer to peaks and buy nearer the bottom. One doesn’t have to look much further than downtown Baltimore to find famously successful investors—Bill Miller of Legg Mason and Brian Rogers of T. Rowe Price come to mind. (more…)

We’ve all heard about the importance of asset allocation. But how can it really help you? What do those different allocations mean for risk? And do you really need to reallocate?

This study demonstrates how splitting one’s assets between bonds and stocks in different ways affects the performance of a portfolio, while simultaneously showing the effect that rebalancing the portfolio has on returns and risk (volatility). The analysis constructs a $1,000,000 investment starting in 1983. Various portfolio strategies are then modeled, and the results shown as of December 31, 2009. As one might expect, the highest returns are achieved by allocating a higher percentage of funds into stocks, but the risks associated with such an allocation are much higher. (more…)